|
June 27, 1990 Church Seeks Influence in Schools, Business,
Science By Robert W. Welkos and Joel Sappell, Times Staff Writers Emerging from
years of internal strife and public scandal, the Scientology movement has
embarked on a sweeping and sophisticated campaign to gain new influence in
America. The goal is
to refurbish the tarnished image of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard and
elevate him to the ranks of history's great humanitarians and thinkers. By so
doing, the church hopes to broaden the acceptability of Hubbard's Scientology
teachings and attract millions of new members. The campaign relies on official church programs and a
network of groups run by Scientology followers. Here is a sampler of their
activities: Scientologists are disseminating Hubbard's writings in public
and private school classrooms across the U.S., using groups that seldom publicize
their Scientology connections. In the
business world, Scientologists have established highly successful private
consulting firms to promote Hubbard as a management expert, with a goal of
harvesting new, affluent members. Scientologists are the driving force behind two organizations
active in the scientific community. The organizations have been busy trying to
sell government agencies a chemical detoxification treatment developed by
Hubbard. The
Scientology movement's ambitious quest to assimilate into the American
mainstream comes less than a decade after the church seemed destined for
collapse, testifying to its remarkable determination to survive and grow. In 1980, 11
top church leaders--including Hubbard's wife--were imprisoned for bugging and
burglarizing government offices as part of a shadowy conspiracy to discredit
the church's perceived enemies. Today,
Scientology executives insist that the organization is law-abiding, that the
offenders have been purged and that the church has now entered an era in which
harmony has replaced hostility. But as the
movement attempts to broaden its reach, evidence is mounting that Hubbard's
devotees are engaging in practices that, while not unlawful, have begun to stir
memories of its troubled past. Scientology
and the Schools The
Scientology movement has launched a concerted campaign to gain a foothold in
the nation's schools by distributing to children millions of copies of a
booklet Hubbard wrote on basic moral values. The program
is designed to win recognition for Hubbard as an educator and moralist and, at
the same time, introduce him to the nation's youth. The
pocket-size booklet, entitled "The Way to Happiness," is a
compilation of widely agreed upon values that Hubbard put into writing in 1981.
Its 96 pages include such admonitions as "take care of yourself,"
"honor and help your parents," "do not murder" and "be
worthy of trust." The booklet
notes in small print that it was written by Hubbard as "an individual and
is not part of any religious doctrine." But
Scientology publications have called the campaign "the largest
dissemination project in Scientology history" and "the bridge between
broad society and Scientology." Scientologists estimate that 3.5 million copies have been
introduced into 4,500 elementary, junior high and senior high schools
nationwide. Altogether, more than 28 million copies have been translated into
at least 14 languages and distributed throughout the world. The booklet
is distributed by the Concerned Businessmen's Assn. of America, an organization
not officially connected to the church but run by Scientologists. The
Scientology connection is downplayed by the group. Its leader, Barbara Ayash of
Marina del Rey, said she launched the association after five of her children
became involved with drugs. Her group
runs a nationwide contest encouraging students to stay off drugs by following
the precepts in Hubbard's booklet. Participants in the "Set a Good
Example" contest must come up with projects using the booklet as their
guide. By focusing on the drug issue, the association has won the backing of
school officials and political figures unaware of its links to Scientology. In Louisiana,
a junior high school distributed Hubbard's booklet to students and then had
them pledge in writing: "I
promise to do my best to learn, practice and use the 21 points of good moral
conduct contained in 'The Way to Happiness' book to improve myself, set a good
example for my friends, and to help my family, my community and my
country." As an
incentive to get campus administrators on board, the association awards $5,000
to the winning elementary, junior high and senior high schools. At contest
awards ceremonies, the winners and Hubbard's book share the spotlight. For example,
during a ceremony at the Charleston, W.Va., civic center, then-Gov. Arch Moore
and other dignitaries were each presented a leather-bound copy of "The Way
To Happiness." Scientology
critics contend that the contest is being used to enlist new church members,
who, as the theory goes, may be so inspired by "The Way to Happiness"
that they will reach for Hubbard's other writings. They argue that the
booklet's distribution in public schools violates constitutional mandates
separating church and state. But Ayash of
the businessmen's association insists that her group has no motive other than
to help children lead better lives. "The Way to Happiness," she said,
shows them the path in simple, direct language. For the most
part, school officials whose campuses have participated in the contest said
they were unaware of Hubbard's Scientology connection or that his followers
were directing the contest. They said Scientology was not openly promoted and
they did not regret taking part. But one
California public school system recently banned the contest after
administrators conducted an investigation and learned that Hubbard was the
author of Scientology's doctrine. For three
years, students at El Capitan Middle School in Fresno participated in the
nationwide contest. In Spring, 1989, the students won second place for
organizing an anti-drug relay in which they passed each other a symbolic
"torch"--Hubbard's booklet. Deluxe leather-bound
copies were presented to mayors of the 15 cities along the relay route. Last fall,
the contest's sponsors decided to accelerate their efforts in Fresno County,
urging the entire 5,000-student Central Unified School District to participate,
instead of just one school. But they ran up against Geoff Garratt, the
district's director of educational services and personnel. Garratt said
that, while he was aware of Scientology, he had never heard of Hubbard. He said
he learned of the connection at the local library, where he went to investigate
Hubbard's background. "The
more I investigated," Garratt said, "I found it (the businessmen's
association) represented a very small self-interest group: Scientology."
Among other things, he said, he discovered that the association had the same
phone number and address as the local Dianetics center. Garratt said
he rejected the association's plea to expand the contest, fearing that the
booklet's distribution in the public schools might violate constitutional
prohibitions against mixing matters of church and state. Garratt said
the association refused to consider the possibility of holding the contest
without Hubbard's booklet. "They said flat out, 'Without the book, there
is no contest.' " Scientologists also are attempting to install a Hubbard
tutorial program in public schools, using a church-affiliated organization
called Applied Scholastics. Yellow
posters advertising Applied Scholastics have appeared in storefront windows
throughout Los Angeles. They promise better learning skills but make no mention
of the church. Applied
Scholastics currently has plans to build a 1,000-acre campus, where the
organization would train educators to teach Hubbard's tutorial program. A
recent Applied Scholastics mailer predicted that the training center will be a
"model of real education for the world" and "create overwhelming
public popularity" for Hubbard. Developed for
students of Scientology, the Hubbard program is built upon an elementary
premise: learning difficulties arise when students read past words they do not
understand. "The
misunderstood word in a subject produces a vast panorama of mental effects and
is the prime factor involved in stupidity," Hubbard wrote in 1967.
"This is a sweepingly fantastic discovery in the field of education." The chief
solution he propounds is simple: students must learn to use a dictionary when
they encounter an unfamiliar or confusing word. In recent
years, Applied Scholastics has targeted predominantly minority schools, where
many students tend to do poorly on standardized tests. Applied Scholastics
considers these schools fertile ground because campus administrators are
willing to try new approaches to improve scores. The Compton
Unified School District in 1987 and 1988 allowed the Hubbard program to be
tested with 80 students at Centennial Senior High School. The program there was
run by a substitute teacher named Frizell Clegg, a Scientologist who was an
Applied Scholastics consultant. Clegg, who
refused to be interviewed, was suspended from his teaching duties in 1988 after
he reportedly gave discourses on Scientology in a history class. He no longer
teaches at the school. In applying
for district financing, Clegg said the educational program was "developed
by American writer and educator L. Ron Hubbard." Excluding any reference
to Hubbard's Scientology connection, he persuaded the board to provide $5,000
to tutor 30 sophomores with low reading scores and to conduct a parent
workshop. After the
program grew to 50 students, Applied Scholastics submitted a proposal
increasing the number of students to 125 and the cost to $27,000. District
officials killed the program, believing that Applied Scholastics was seeking to
expand too quickly. Officials were also displeased that the group, without
district approval, was using its involvement with Centennial to market the
program elsewhere, according to Acting Supt. Elisa Sanchez. In
promotional literature, Applied Scholastics made claims of remarkable success
at Centennial High. While some parents said the program helped their children,
Sanchez said the claims made by Applied Scholastics were unsubstantiated. Converting
the Business World Scientology
is using a network of private consulting firms to gain a foothold in the U.S.
business community. The firms
promise businessmen higher earnings but appear to be mainly interested in
recruiting new members for the church. Although
these profit-making firms operate independently of each other, they sell the
same product: Scientology founder Hubbard's methods for running a profitable
enterprise. The Church of Scientology has for years employed these same
methods--heavy marketing, high productivity and rigid rules of employee
conduct--to amass hundreds of millions of dollars for itself. Critics
contend that the consulting firms are concealing their Scientology links so
they can attract to the church prosperous people who might otherwise be put off
by Scientology's controversial reputation. The strategy
appears to have proven effective. A Scientology
publication in 1987 reported that the consultant network earned a combined $1.6
million a month selling Hubbard's management methods to a variety of
professionals, many of whom have reported improved incomes. It also said that
50 to 75 businessmen were recruited monthly into the church, where each week
they spent a total of $250,000 on Scientology courses. Two of the
movement's firms have been ranked by Inc. magazine as among the fastest growing
private businesses in America. The consulting
firms use seminars and mailers to attract health professionals, salesmen,
office supply dealers, marketing specialists and others. Those who
have dealt with the firms describe the process this way: Businessmen
are drawn into Scientology after they have gained confidence in Hubbard's
non-religious management methods. They are often told that, to achieve true
business success, they should get their personal lives in order. From there,
the church takes over, encouraging them to purchase spiritual enhancement
courses and begin a process called "auditing." During
auditing, a person confesses his innermost thoughts while his responses are
monitored on a lie detector-type device known as the E-meter. Auditing must be
purchased in 12 1/2-hour chunks, costing between $3,000 and $11,000 each,
depending on where it is bought. Spearheading
all this is an arm of the church called World Institute of Scientology
Enterprises, or WISE. In recent
months, WISE has been encouraging Scientologists nationwide to become
consultants within their respective professions. The appeal is simple: make
money while disseminating your religion. In the
process, WISE profits, too. It trains and licenses the firms to sell Hubbard's
copyrighted "management and administrative technology." WISE charges
roughly $12,000 for its basic no-frills training course. For consulting
services, it charges $1,875 a day. On top of
this, the consulting firms that sell Hubbard's business methods must pay WISE
13% of their annual gross income. At the heart
of Hubbard's business system is a concept he called "management by
statistics," which he said guarantees optimum office efficiency.
Scientology critics maintain, however, that it creates an oppressive and
regimented workplace environment. An employee
is judged solely upon his productivity, which is charted on a graph each week.
Sagging productivity could bring a rebuke from the boss. Or it could lead to an
employee's firing. The
management techniques promoted by the consulting firms are identical to those
used by the church, except that all Scientology references have been deleted
from the materials. The consultants even employ the most basic instrument used
by the church to recruit new members off the street--a 200-question personality
test that purports to let people know if they have ruinous personality flaws. The
consultants encourage businessmen and their employees to purchase Scientology
courses to remedy personality problems uncovered by the test. One of the
most successful consulting firms licensed by WISE is Sterling Management
Systems, which targets dentists and other health care professionals. For the
past two years, Inc. magazine has ranked it among America's fastest-growing
privately held businesses. Sterling,
based in Glendale, claims to be the "largest health care management
consulting group in the U.S." A company
spokesman said the firm charges clients $10,000 for its complete line of
Hubbard courses and 30 hours of private consultation. The spokesman said
Sterling has helped dentists increase their income an average of $10,000 a
month. He insisted
that the company has "no connection" to the church, but added:
"If people are interested in Scientology, we will make it available to
them." Sterling
publishes a tabloid called "Today's Professional, the Journal of
Successful Practice Management." Mailed free to 300,000 health care
professionals nationwide, it is filled with "management" articles by
Hubbard that are actually excerpts from Scientology's governing doctrines. The company
also holds nationwide seminars that, according to its promotional literature,
have been drawing 2,000 people a month. Sterling
Management was founded in 1983 by Scientologist Gregory K. Hughes, at the time
a prosperous dentist in Vacaville, Calif. Hughes holds seminars across the
country, offering himself as evidence that Hubbard's methods work. In
promotional publications for Sterling, Hughes has said that his annual income
soared from $257,000 in 1979 to more than $1 million in 1985. In one month
alone, he has claimed to have seen 350 new patients. Sterling's
paper, Today's Professional, has boasted that "the techniques that
produced amazing results when applied to Greg's practice are being applied all
over the U.S." But neither
the paper's readers nor those who attend Hughes' seminars are told that his
dental office, which employed the high-volume Hubbard techniques that he
imparts to others, has been accused by former patients of dental negligence and
malpractice. Hughes
currently is under investigation by the California Board of Dental Examiners.
The board already has turned over some of its findings to the state attorney
general's office, which will determine whether action should be taken against
Hughes' dental license. To date,
there are more than 15 lawsuits pending against Hughes and his dental
associates, alleging either negligence or malpractice. He has denied the
allegations. Attorney E.
Bradley Nelson is representing most of those who have sued Hughes. "It is
my opinion," he said, "that the overall quality of care took second
place to the profit motive. . . . I've never seen anything approaching this
volume of complaints against one dentist in such a short period of time." In mid-1985, Hughes
closed his office without warning to devote full time to Sterling. He left
behind a reputation so tarnished that he was unable to sell his
million-dollar-a-year practice, according to dentists in the area. "He
actually had to walk away," said Roger Abrew, co-chairman of the peer
review committee of local dental society. He also left
behind patients with worse problems than they had before they were treated by
Hughes' office, according to Abrew and other dentists, who have since been
treating them. The dentists said that, based on their examinations, Hughes'
office performed both substandard and unnecessary work. "I think
its kind of ironic to see a guy who did such a botched job of dentistry
teaching others," said dentist David C. Aronson, summing up the sentiments
of most of his colleagues in the small Northern California community. Hughes, who
continues to conduct his "Winning With Dentistry" seminars, refused
to be interviewed for this story. But Frederick Bradley, an attorney defending
him in the lawsuits, suggested that the Vacaville dentists may simply resent
his client's success because their patients had deserted them for Hughes. Another firm
once licensed by Scientology's WISE organization to sell Hubbard's management
techniques was Singer Consultants. Before it merged with another management
company, Singer was ranked as one of the nation's fastest growing private
businesses. The company
focused its training on America's chiropractors. It brought hundreds of new
members into the church and triggered a nationwide controversy among
chiropractors over its links to Scientology. In fact, a chiropractic newspaper
devoted almost an entire issue to letters praising and condemning Singer
Consultants, which was located in Clearwater, Fla., where Scientology is a
major presence. "We felt
that there were young doctors who didn't know they were being solicited to do
something above and beyond the practice of their profession," said Dynamic
Chiropractic editor Donald M. Peterson, explaining why his Huntington
Beach-based newspaper entered the controversy. Singer
Consultants was headed by Scientologist David Singer, an accomplished speaker
and chiropractor who held nationwide seminars to pitch Hubbard's business
methods. Two years
ago, the company was absorbed into another management firm owned by
Scientologists. Although
Singer refused to be interviewed by The Times, he told Dynamic Chiropractic:
"Hubbard was a prolific writer and wrote on a multitude of subjects. We do
not, have not and will not make part of our program the teaching of any
religion." Scientology
and Science Hubbard was
so proud of a detoxification treatment he developed--and so hungry for
plaudits--that he openly talked with his closest aides about winning a Nobel
Prize. Although the
man is gone, Scientologists are keeping the dream alive. They have embarked
upon a controversial plan to win recognition for Hubbard and his treatment
program in scientific and medical circles. The treatment
purports to purge drugs and toxins from a person's system through a rigorous
regimen of exercise, saunas and vitamins--a combination intended to dislodge
the poisons from fatty tissues and sweat them out. Physicians
affiliated with the regimen have touted it as a major breakthrough, and a
number of patients who have undergone the treatment say their health improved.
But some health authorities dismiss Hubbard's program as a medical fraud that
preys upon public fear of toxins. In the Church
of Scientology, the treatment is called the "purification rundown."
Church members are told it is a religious program that, for about $2,000, will
purify the body and spirit. In the secular arena, however, Scientologists are
promoting it exclusively as a medical treatment with no spiritual
underpinnings. In that context, it is simply called the "Hubbard
Method." The treatment
is being aggressively pushed in the non-Scientology world by two organizations
that sometimes work alone and sometimes in tandem. They have no formal church
ties but both are controlled by church members. Seeking
customers and credibility, the two groups have targeted government and private
workers nationwide who are exposed to hazardous substances in their jobs. They
have pressed public agencies to endorse the method, lobbied unions to recommend
it and written articles in trade journals that seem to be little more than
advertisements for the treatment. One of these
groups is the Los Angeles-based Foundation for Advancements in Science and
Education. The nonprofit foundation has forged links with scientists across the
country to gain legitimacy for itself and, thus, for Hubbard's detox method. Among its key
functionaries is a toxicologist for the Environmental Protection Agency, whose
advocacy of the treatment has raised conflict-of-interest questions. Building
credentials and allies, the foundation has channeled tens of thousands of
dollars in grants to educators and researchers studying toxicological hazards,
most of whom were unaware of the organization's ties to the Scientology
movement. In 1986, for
example, the foundation gave $10,000 to the Los Angeles County Health
Department for a study of potentially harmful radon gas. County officials say
they were not apprised of the organization's links with the Scientology
movement. Bill Franks
was instrumental in creating the foundation in 1981 when he served as the
Church of Scientology's executive director, a post from which he was later ousted
in a power struggle. Franks described the foundation in an interview as a
Scientology "front group." "The
concept," he said, "was to get some scientific recognition" for
Hubbard's treatment without overtly linking it to the church. Buttressing
Franks' account, the foundation's original incorporation papers state that its
purpose was to "research the efficacy of and promote the use of the works
of L. Ron Hubbard in the solving of social problems; and to scientifically
research and provide public information and education concerning the efficacy
of other programs." The document
was later amended, however, to remove Hubbard's name, obscuring the
foundation's ties to the Scientology movement and its founder in official
records. Hubbard's
name, however, continues to appear regularly in the foundation's slick
newsletter. In the latest edition, for instance, three different articles
advocate the "Hubbard method" as an effective therapy for chemical
and drug detoxification. A fourth
article did not mention Hubbard by name, but reported favorably on Narconon,
his drug and alcohol rehabilitation program, which is run by Scientologists. The other
organization in the outreach effort is HealthMed Clinic, which administers
Hubbard's treatment from offices in Los Angeles and Sacramento and is run by
Scientologists. An
independent medical consultant in Maryland who reviewed the program for the
city of Shreveport, La., dismissed Hubbard's treatment as "quackery." The
foundation and HealthMed have attempted to create an impression that they are
linked only by a shared concern over toxic hazards. In reality, however, they
operate symbiotically. The
foundation, for its part, tries to scientifically validate the Hubbard method
through studies and articles by individuals who either are Scientologists or
hold foundation positions. HealthMed then uses the foundation's credibility,
writings and connections to get customers for the treatment. According to
state corporate records, the foundation also holds stock in HealthMed.
Moreover, the foundation's vice president, Scientologist Jack Dirmann, has
served as HealthMed's administrator. In 1986, four
doctors with the California Department of Health Services accused HealthMed of
making "false medical claims" and of "taking advantage of the
fears of workers and the public and about toxic chemicals and their potential
health effects, including cancer." The doctors also criticized the
foundation for supporting "scientifically questionable" research. The state
physicians, who evaluate potential toxic hazards in the workplace, leveled the
accusations in a letter that triggered an investigation by the state Board of
Medical Quality Assurance. That probe was concluded last year without a finding
of whether the detox treatment works. Investigators said they were stymied by
HealthMed's refusal to provide patient records and by a lack of complaints from
those who had undergone the regimen. The four
physicians who prompted the investigation said they decided to study the
Hubbard treatment after receiving calls from union representatives, public
agencies and individual workers throughout the state who had been solicited by
the clinics. Among them were the California Highway Patrol, the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and the Los
Angeles County Fire and Sheriff's departments. "It was
the accumulation of these calls that led us to say, 'Hey, this is going on all
over the state. Let's look into it,' " recalled Gideon Letz, one of the
doctors. The
foundation and HealthMed have worked particularly hard to tap one large pool of
potential clients: firefighters. The Hubbard method has been pitched to them as
a cure for exposure to a carcinogen sometimes encountered during fires. Known
as PCBs, the now-banned chemical compound was once widely used to insulate
transformers. City
officials in Shreveport, La., said they paid HealthMed $80,000--and were ready
to spend a lot more--until they hired a consultant, who denounced the
treatments as unnecessary and worthless. What happened
in Shreveport is a case study of how the foundation and HealthMed have worked
together to draw customers through methods that critics contend are
exploitative. In April,
1987, dozens of Shreveport firemen were exposed to PCBs when they responded to
an early morning transformer explosion at the Louisiana State University
Medical Center. In the aftermath, some began to complain of headaches,
dizziness, skin rashes, memory loss and other symptoms that they attributed to
the exposure. Blood and
tissue tests by the university medical center showed no abnormal levels of PCBs
in their systems. But the firemen wondered if the university was trying to
protect itself from liability because the explosion had occured there. Searching for
alternatives, one of the firemen came across an article in Fire Engineering
magazine. Headlined "Chemical Exposure in Firefighting: The Enemy
Within," it was written by Gerald T. Lionelli, "senior research
associate for the Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education." Lionelli
discussed the frightening consequences of chemical exposure and then got to the
point. He said the foundation had found an effective detoxification technique
developed by "the late American researcher L. Ron Hubbard" and
delivered by HealthMed Clinic. The article
did not mention another of Hubbard's notable developments--Scientology. The firemen
contacted HealthMed, and, before long, were sold on the program. They went next
to Howard Foggin, then the city's medical claims officer, and gave him
HealthMed literature and a Washington, D.C., phone number the clinic had
provided them. It was for the office of EPA toxicologist William Marcus. Marcus, a
non-Scientologist, is a senior adviser to the foundation. But it is his
authoritative position with the EPA's office of drinking water that helps
impress potential HealthMed clients. When
Shreveport officials called Marcus, he vouched for HealthMed. The EPA had
spoken, or so the city's claims manager thought back then. "All he
told me was, it seemed I had no alternative but to send those people to Los
Angeles" for HealthMed's treatment, Foggin said, adding: "I felt I
had to get moving on it fast." In an interview
with The Times, Marcus acknowledged that he recommended HealthMed, but he
denied any conflict of interest. "They
called me and I talked to them," Marcus said. "I told them that
basically there was no other game in town. . . . I think L. Ron Hubbard is a
bona fide genius." Marcus said
he receives only travel-related expenses for the foundation work. His boss,
Michael Cook, said he is satisfied that Marcus did not act improperly. He said
that Marcus has insisted "he made it clear that he was not speaking as an
EPA employee. Certainly that is what we would hope and expect he (would)
do." In all,
HealthMed brought about 20 Shreveport firefighters to Los Angeles to treat what
the clinic described as high levels of PCBs in their blood and fatty tissues.
For the most part, the firemen returned home saying that they felt better. Although city
officials had learned of Hubbard's Scientology connection, they were
unconcerned. Then, as
HealthMed's bills mounted, two private insurance carriers for Shreveport
suggested that city officials hire an independent analyst to review the
treatment before doling out more money. The city agreed and commissioned a
study by National Medical Advisory Service Inc., of Bethesda, Md. The report,
prepared by Dr. Ronald E. Gots, was an indictment of HealthMed's
professionalism and ethics. The bottom line: "The
treatment in California preyed upon the fears of concerned workers, but served
no rational medical function. . . . Moreover, the program itself, developed not
by physicians or scientists, but by the founder of the Church of Scientology,
has no recognized value in the established medical and scientific community. It
is quackery." Gots' 1987
report ended the city's involvement with HealthMed. "I think
we were misled," lamented city finance director Jim Keyes. "Somebody
should have laid everything out on the table." Neither HealthMed nor the foundation
would return phone calls from The Times. |